<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>Netbook Review, notebook review, tablet review, PC review &#187; mainboard</title> <atom:link href="http://gadgetmix.com/tag/mainboard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://gadgetmix.com</link> <description>Gadgetmix reviews netbooks, notebooks and tablets</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>More than 50 percent Main board failures in OQO O2 and E2</title><link>http://gadgetmix.com/umpc/more-than-50-percent-main-board-failures-in-oqo-o2-and-e2/</link> <comments>http://gadgetmix.com/umpc/more-than-50-percent-main-board-failures-in-oqo-o2-and-e2/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:45:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Paul Merak</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[UMPC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[current users]]></category> <category><![CDATA[customer support]]></category> <category><![CDATA[e2]]></category> <category><![CDATA[main boards]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mainboard]]></category> <category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[motherboard]]></category> <category><![CDATA[o2]]></category> <category><![CDATA[oqo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[oqo 2+]]></category> <category><![CDATA[oqo mainboard]]></category> <category><![CDATA[oqo motherboard]]></category> <category><![CDATA[poll]]></category> <category><![CDATA[strange results]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmix.com/index/?p=5447</guid> <description><![CDATA[There is a poll going on in the OQOtalk forum (most popular OQO community) regarding the Main Board failures. Quite shockingly, the poll is reflecting some really strange results. More than 50-percent people had to get the main board changed atleast once. Some users had to get their OQO's main board changed twice in an year.Clearly, this reflects the poor manufacturing quality of the OQO. Too many failing main boards are not expected from a product that costs $1000+. Couple that with the <a href="http://gadgetmix.com/index/oqo-customer-supports-sucks-in-asia-umpc/" target="_blank"><strong>EXTREMELY</strong></a> poor customer support and bleak future of OQO (<a href="http://gadgetmix.com/index/oqo-cancels-all-preorders-for-model-2/" target="_blank">canceling all OQO 2+ orders</a>), things do not look so good for the current users.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://gadgetmix.com/umpc/more-than-50-percent-main-board-failures-in-oqo-o2-and-e2/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>40</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/11 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 302/332 objects using disk: basic

Served from: gadgetmix.com @ 2012-05-25 11:42:52 -->
