AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs Ryzen 9 3950X benchmark comparison

According to official benchmark indicators, when compared with Ryzen 9 3950X, the content creation performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is increased by 27%, and the game performance is touted to be increased by 29%.

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs Ryzen 9 3950X benchmark

Compared with the i9-10900K, the creative performance is up to 59% and the game performance is higher. Up to 11%.

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs Ryzen 9 3950X benchmark

Next, look at”Ryzen 9 5900X”. Same as the current Ryzen 9 3900X, it has dual CCDs, 12 cores, 24 threads, 6MB L2 cache, 64MB L3 cache (naturally changed), and the base frequency is lowered from 3.8GHz To 3.7GHz, but the maximum acceleration frequency is increased from 4.6GHz to 4.8GHz , and the thermal design power consumption remains 105W. If you compare Ryzen 9 3900XT, the base frequency is lowered by 100MHz and the acceleration frequency is increased by 100MHz.

According to official data, the Ryzen 9 5900X CineBench R20 single-threaded score is as high as 631, which is the first time in the history of desktop processors to break the 600-point mark. Whether it is Ryzen 9 3900XT or i9-10900K, the score is around 544, a comparative improvement. Is 16%.

The frequency is fine-tuned to 100MHz and the single-core performance has improved so much, I have to admire the Zen 3 architecture is really good.

In terms of game performance (1080p resolution), Ryzen 9 5900X is up to 50% higher than Ryzen 9 3900X, and up to 21% higher than i9-10900K. Of course, there are a few slightly inferior ones.

Accordingly, AMD claims that the Ryzen 9 5900X is the best gaming processor in the world -which makes Intel, which has always given this title to its flagship, so much so.

Then there is”Ryzen 7 5800X”, single CCD, 8-core 16 threads, 4MB L2 cache, 32MB L3 cache, base frequency 3.8GHz, maximum acceleration 4.7GHz, which is 100MHz lower than Ryzen 7 3800XT, the latter No change, the thermal design power consumption is 105W.

The last is”Ryzen 5 5600X”, 6 cores and 12 threads, 3MB L2 cache, 32MB L3 cache, base frequency 3.7GHz, maximum acceleration 4.6GHz , compared with Ryzen 5 3600XT, the former is reduced by 100MHz and the latter is increased by 100MHz. The thermal design power consumption is 65W.

AMD did not provide specific performance data for the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 5 5600X, but it advertised a wave of cost performance:

Compared with i9-10900K, Ryzen 9 5900X is 13% higher in single thread, 23% higher in multi-thread, and 3% higher in 1080p games.

Compared with i7-10700K, Ryzen 7 5800X is 9% higher in single-thread, 11% higher in multi-thread, and the 1080p game is the same.

Compared with i5-10600K, Ryzen 5 5600X is 19% higher in single thread, 20% higher in multi-thread, and 13% higher in 1080p games.

Specifically, the Zen 3 architecture doubles the number of cores of each CCX module to 8 (16 threads), and the capacity of the third-level cache is also doubled to 32MB, and all 8 cores are shared and can be directly accessed, which is equivalent to each the core’s three-level cache capacity has also doubled, which greatly accelerates the communication connection between the core and the cache in practical applications and significantly reduces memory latency.